Featured
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Is Nuclear Fusion the Future of Energy?
Introduction
Over the last couple centuries, fossil fuels have been adopted as the
primary source of energy, acting as the engine of the industrial
revolution and now the modern world. It has been of great service, being
fairly cheap and common as well as universally usable in our modern
world of machines. Yet scientific research into the environmental impact
of fossil fuels has now gained recognition, and we are already
witnessing climatic changes. As it emits significant quantities of
carbon dioxide into the atmosphere the earth becomes further wrapped in
the blanket of greenhouse gases — heating up our planet and preparing to
change our ecosystem, soon in a substantial manner. Furthermore, this
source of energy is non-renewable, and it will soon no longer be
commonplace but will instead become an increasingly rare group of
materials. Current estimates say that we have less than two centuries of
coal left and that some fossil fuels, such as oil, may only last us
until 2060.
So how can this be fixed? There are a wide variety of renewable and
sustainable energy sources available, such as solar, wind, hydraulic,
geothermal and nuclear. Options such as solar are likely the most useful
and efficient given our current technological standing, as well as
options such as nuclear power plants if approached in an intelligent
manner. However, the most sustainable and powerful of all of these is a
somewhat unfamiliar energy source — a lesser known type of nuclear
energy known as fusion.
Nuclear fusion, like the more familiar nuclear fission, harnesses the
power of the atom to generate vast amounts of energy. Unlike fission
however, fusion goes about generating this power in a different manner,
which is both safer and more powerful. Rather than splitting the nucleus
of the atom, of an element like uranium, apart, fusion collides two
atoms together — creating a hot and powerful nuclear reaction. Fusion
takes two atoms of hydrogen (one of deuterium and one of tritium) and
collides them together in a reactor — doing so on a greater scale and
subsequently producing vast amounts of energy. Also unlike fission,
fusion is far safer and does not emit byproducts of, if uncontained,
harmful radiation, but rather of helium (which is the sum of two
hydrogen atoms), an inert and non harmful gas. This has something to do
with the non-artificial nature of nuclear fusion, as they are a common
process occurring within every single star in the universe, which are
essentially giant fusion reactors. By thinking about fusion reactors as a
recreation of stars, we can gain a deeper and more clear conceptual
understanding of nuclear fusion. Stars are extremely hot, as this is the
condition required for fusion processes, which occur in a plasma —
something which forms after a material is too hot to be a gas, and which
all stars consist of. Similarly, nuclear fusion reactors must operate
at extremely high temperatures, of roughly 100 million degrees celsius.
As well as this, nuclear fusion must also be confined by some force in
order to increase collisions and overcome repulsion. In stars, fusion is
confined by the gravity of stars, however we, on earth, are not making
fusion reactors of this magnitude and must instead take a different
approach. The most commonly used approach is to magnetically confine the
plasma, keeping it in a loop, these are typically either as tokamaks in
a donut shape or as stellarators which are looped in over themselves.
Another more modern approach is something known as inertial confinement,
where the plasma is confined in an extremely small area, pushing them
all very close together. In principle, this process of generating energy
has extremely powerful results, often being labelled as the ‘perfect’
energy source of the future, however this does not come without its
practical challenges.
As aforementioned, nuclear fusion has many demanding conditions to work
successfully, and even though our modern engineering prowess has managed
to produce these conditions, it remains an obvious challenge. Besides
the evident difficulty of producing plasma at temperatures around one
hundred million degrees Celsius, there is also a requirement of a very
high-tech cooling system to keep the surrounding area from melting as
well as creating suitable conditions for the superconducting magnets. To
contain the heat in these reactors, state-of-the-art cryogenic systems
are demanded, which make use of large quantities of supercritical helium
liquid pumped throughout the surrounding of the magnets and the outside
of the reactors. Furthermore, these cooling systems are not only
required to reduce the reactor to room temperature, but must, in the
case of magnetically confined reactors, minimise the temperatures from
around a hundred million degrees Celsius to around -270 degrees Celsius,
or 4 Kelvin. This is because the superconducting magnets used to
confine the plasma can only operate at low temperatures approaching
absolute zero.In addition to this, there are also technological
challenges in the production of energy — these have been the most
strenuous challenges, puzzling teams of brilliant scientists for decades
and still doing so. Most notably, the task of applying our research
into a complete nuclear fusion reactor system has proved very difficult,
albeit that we are certainly making strides in the field. In 2022,
scientists achieved "ignition" when they produced more energy than what
was used to start the reaction. This has been recognised as a major
achievement in the development of creating working and feasible fusion
reactors, as it means that we have developed a system that utilises
fusion to generate energy. Yet, this is but one of several stages in
developing the “perfect energy source”, from “ignition” to the
commercialisation of fusion upon economical and financial feasibility.
The most important stage in this development will be when we have not
only produced more energy than is needed to commence the reaction, but
have produced more energy than is needed to power the entire reactor.
This means that the fusion reactor must power everything, from lasers
and heating systems to superconducting magnets and cryogenic systems,
which presents an obvious engineering hurdle that demands much more
energy output than merely surpassing the kick-start energy. Beyond this,
to meet commercial feasibility, the reactor must not only be entirely
self-sufficient but must produce enough power to feed the grid and power
our world. As a result of these challenges, fusion is still a few
decades away from being seen as an option for the grid. But, the toiling
of the scientists, engineers, and investors will be worth it once we
can bestow the grid with the power of the atom. So what does this future
look like and why is it so necessary?
The benefits offered by nuclear fusion are vast, giving us access to
clean and unfaltering energy to sustainably power our ever-growing
demand of energy — which will only increase as we develop increasingly
awesome technologies and venture beyond Earth into the heavens. Fusion,
as a limitless and clean source of energy, will act as the perfect means
to power our central grids, and as its feasibility continues to
increase will be able to be used among technologies like dyson spheres
well into the future, collectively powering planets and solar systems as
we inhabit the galaxy. As well as having the potential to be the
primary centralised energy source to feed the demands of worlds, fusion
also has prospects as a power source for spacecraft travelling and
transporting both people and cargo from between planets and solar
systems. Due to individual fusion operating at such a small scale, it
can be collectively scaled to any size, meaning that its reactor size
and fuel demands can be moulded to the demands of the spacecraft (such
that our technology has met that stage). Overall fusion has incredible
potential and to better comprehend this, one can look at it in
comparison to solar power. Solar panels convert some quantity (depending
on their efficiency) of photons from the sun, a giant fusion reactor,
into energy. Fusion reactors, on the other hand, do not merely obtain
partial energy produced by fusion, but all of it. Of course, larger
expanses of more efficient solar panels can be produced in the future,
but fusion has a far superior capability of producing energy as the
result of increasing its size and energy efficiency. Nuclear fusion
serves as an inspiring means of energy production with magnificent
potential in the future, where it may well serve as one of our primary
sources of energy in an ever-advancing world of real science fiction.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Popular Posts
How far away is Artificial General Intelligence?
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
The Urgent Case for Nuclear Power: Our Only Solution to the Energy Crisis
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment